您的位置: 标准下载 » 国内标准 » GB 国标 »

GB/T 2688-2012 滑动轴承 粉末冶金轴承技术条件

时间:2024-05-21 20:54:46 来源: 标准资料网 作者:标准资料网 阅读:8144
下载地址: 点击此处下载
基本信息
标准名称:滑动轴承 粉末冶金轴承技术条件
英文名称:Plain bearing—Technical specification of powder metallurgy bearing
中标分类: 机械 >> 通用零部件 >> 滑动轴承
ICS分类: 机械系统和通用件 >> 轴承 >> 滑动轴承
替代情况:替代GB/T 2688-1981
发布部门:中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局 中国国家标准化管理委员会
发布日期:2012-05-11
实施日期:2012-12-01
首发日期:1981-06-17
作废日期:
主管部门:全国滑动轴承标准化技术委员会(SAC/TC 236)
提出单位:中国机械工业联合会
归口单位:全国滑动轴承标准化技术委员会(SAC/TC 236)
起草单位:中机生产力促进中心、合肥波林新材料有限公司等
出版社:中国标准出版社
出版日期:2012-12-01
页数:12页
适用范围

本标准规定了GB/T18323中规定的粉末冶金轴承的技术条件。
本标准适用于粉末冶金铁基和铜基轴承。

前言

没有内容

目录

没有内容

引用标准

下列文件对于本文件的应用是必不可少的。凡是注日期的引用文件,仅注日期的版本适用于本文件。凡是不注日期的引用文件,其最新版本(包括所有的修改单)适用于本文件。
GB/T223(所有部分) 钢铁及合金化学分析方法
GB443—1989 L-AN 全损耗系统用油
GB/T1800.1—2009 产品几何技术规范(GPS) 极限与配合 第1部分:公差、偏差和配合的基础
GB/T1800.2—2009 产品几何技术规范(GPS) 极限与配合 第2部分:标准公差等级和孔、轴极限偏差表
GB/T1958—2004 产品几何量技术规范(GPS) 形状和位置公差 检测规定
GB/T5163—2006 烧结金属材料(不包括硬质合金) 可渗性烧结金属材料 密度、含油率和开孔率的测定
GB/T6804—2008 烧结金属衬套 径向压溃强度的测定
GB/T9097.1—2002 烧结金属材料(不包括硬质合金)表观硬度的测定 第一部分:截面硬度基本均匀的材料
GB/T10425—2002 烧结金属摩擦材料 表观硬度的测定
GB/T18323—2001 滑动轴承 烧结轴套的尺寸和公差

所属分类: 机械 通用零部件 滑动轴承 机械系统和通用件 轴承 滑动轴承
基本信息
标准名称:6-220KV级 变压器声级
中标分类: 电工 >> 输变电设备 >> 变压器
替代情况:被JB/T 10088-1999代替
发布日期:
实施日期:1991-01-01
首发日期:
作废日期:
出版日期:
适用范围

没有内容

前言

没有内容

目录

没有内容

引用标准

没有内容

所属分类: 电工 输变电设备 变压器
Product Code:SAE J1113/27
Title:Electromagnetic Compatibility Measurements Procedure for Vehicle Components-- Part 27--Immunity to Radiated Electromagnetic Fields--Mode Stir Reverberation Method
Issuing Committee:Electromagnetic Compatibility (Emc) Standards
Scope: Vehicle electrical/electronic systems may be affected when immersed in an electromagnetic field generated by sources such as radio and TV broadcast stations, radar and communication sites, mobile transmitters, cellular phones, etc. Reverberation method is used to evaluate the immunity of electronic devices in the frequency range of 500 MHz to 2.0 GHz, with possible extensions to 200 MHz to 10 GHz. At a later date, pulse modulation capability will be added for testing above 1 GHz. This document provides the component design and test engineers with a test procedure and the performance requirements necessary to evaluate the immunity of electronic devices to radiated electromagnetic fields early in the design stage as well as pilot and production stages. Ensuring electromagnetic compatibility early in the development stage will minimize costly changes later in the program and will prevent excessive component level hardening during full-vehicle level testing. The reverberation test method performs a dual function. The primary function of the method is to provide a bench test procedure correlative to vehicle-level radiated immunity testing in the anechoic chamber and at mobile transmitter sites. The method can be used to evaluate the relative performance of different designs of the same device.hod performs a dual function. The primary function of the method is to provide a bench test procedure correlative to vehicle-level radiated immunity testing in the anechoic chamber and thod performs a dual function. The primary function of the method is to provide a bench test procedure correlative to vehicle-level radiated immunity testing in the anechoic chamber and at mobile transmitter sites. The method can be used to evaluate the relative performance of different designs of the same device.hod performs a dual function. The primary function of the method is to provide a bench test procedure correlative to vehicle-level radiated immunity testing in the anechoic chamber and ahod performs a dual function. The primary function of the method is to provide a bench test procedure correlative to vehicle-level radiated immunity testing in the anechoic chamber and at mobile transmitter sites. The method can be used to evaluate the relative performance of different designs of the same device.ahod performs a dual function. The primary function of the method is to provide a bench test procedure correlative to vehicle-level radiated immunity testing in the anechoic chamber and at mobile transmitter sites. The method can be used to evaluate the relative performance of different designs of the same device.